Universität St. Gallen (UNIVERSITY OF ST. GALLEN)

Every "department" (accounting, banking, etc) can only offer two classes per semester, so there is a natural lack thereof. If you already know what you're interested in (accounting or finance, for example), you're pretty much screwed as far as course selection is concerned. Maybe one finance and one accounting course per semester for the undergraduates and then you're left to choose between filler and masters courses. Obviously there's no problem with the masters courses (in fact, they are more representative of what I can get at my home university in the States), it's just that that kind of selection should be mirrored in the undergraduate course catalog. Courses are all block-fashion, meaning you've got one lecture a week, sometimes for four hours straight. Dealing with TAs instead of the professors themselves is a pain in the ass, and the Swiss students show no interest in the international students, with few exceptions.

Good God, yes! One exam and that's it??? I know not ALL courses operate this way, but the fact that at least 1/3 of them do is quite disturbing. You have no clue how well you know the stuff until you step foot into the final exam. No assessment in the middle of the semester. **YOU HAVE TO SIGN UP TO TAKE TESTS** What genius came up with this idea? I mean if you're gonna take a class, you are gonna take the test, or is this just an American thing? So yeah, I didn't get that memo, which means that I wasn't ALLOWED to take my tests. Fortunately, I took one of them with the exchange students right at the end of the semester, so I got SOME credit for the semester, but on the whole it was a waste of 3 months of my time and money. Will be a blast explaining that to my home university when they ask what I did for the whole semester since I got only 4 credits. The faculty also seems to be way out of touch with the student body. This, however, can be topped: the administration is on it's own level, somewhere circling Venus, as if not caring about what the faculty OR the students wanted was a cool thing. Example: the university REQUIRES many courses to have 2 semester hours of what amounts to homework. However, both students and professors hate it because nobody knows how to approach/formulate it. It's kind of a general rule that if something is mandatory/forced, it's gonna suck. For the US students out there, remember summer reading? For the most part good books, but if you got them on your summer reading list, they were the most painful waste time, and you read the same sentence about five times on page 532 because you fell asleep every time you got to the end of it. That's why I hate Charles Dickens. But both parties go along as if nothing about the system were broken and so nothing gets changed. How about actually giving the faculty control of their own curriculum instead of policing it? I thought that was the whole point of academics (or at least on the teaching side of it) at the college level. They say this is one of the top European business schools, and one of the top two in the German-speaking areas. This leads to the fact that the university is very poor at marketing itself towards its own students -- the administration doesn't seem to give a rat's ass what the students think, but the students go on as if that kind of stuff is normal. They should do an exchange at a smaller liberal arts university in America, and they'd see what they're missing. In short, you really can't compare University of St. Gallen to any American university, big or small, East coast or West. It is lacking in so many areas, but doesn't seem to acknowledge ...

As it was recommended various times by other students, I took strategic managament, which I never regretted. Banking Game was a perfect chance for me to get insights into interconnections of different areas of activities of a bank and how they affect the results of the whole business.

aucun

The quality of staff is excellent. finance with Prof. Zimmerman is recommended. Apparaently, some very good professors in strategy, although I did not do any.

Not really. They could focus a bit more on practical cases, but in that respect hey were better than NHH, my home school.

The system allows you to visit the first lectures after having made your prelimenary choice of courses, which makes it very convenient to adjust your first choice. Don't miss out on this!

There should be better exams organized after every each course. Furthermore the integration of regular students into the classes could be improved.

For MIM courses that are held in English, sign up as soon as possible, by sending an e-mail for the teacher.

One can learn a lot if that is the ones goal. About the papers and exams I can not say a lot yet.

The courses are good, only since I'm a CEMS-student there aren't many courses i can choose from and i think there are more interesting course in the normal curriculum

A more diverse offer in CEMS-courses