13 pieces of assessment across 2 subjects, all HD. Until the meeting of Carlie Drew and Wellett Potter, a duo lecturer team of the law school that seem to enjoy playing favourites with some, while destroying other students. 13 pieces of assessment, all HD, until the assignment for this particular law class (Law100. Try to avoid, unless you're willing to suck up & be The Favourite). Barely received a pass mark, was refused the opportunity for a remark, which I believed to be a student right. The law school blocked every avenue of appeal. The law school admin boss sent me emails saying the marking is fair, yet all evidence points otherwise. I was treated like poop on toast when I argued this pass mark was unfair, and I suspect The Favourite student that all others were compared by was cheating as well. This student got very basic information wrong in our private study group, that any dummy should know, yet shined in front of the lecturers. Also said a couple of things that we had never been taught, which made me ponder they were being handed info from somewhere. Yet the law school lecturers cannot see this, or see a good student. They are blinded by a good show, which explains why they're teaching (poorly), instead of out being a good lawyer. Feel like I was treated like garbage when I argued the pass mark, yet you're training future lawyers in how to argue. Careless teaching, careless marking, careless responses from student admin...all round careless, shoddy work yet they charge an absolute fortune to attend. Pick any other school. Do not go here.
Lire la suite >
Having lectures and readings online is amazing and fun to study this way. Don't have to leave my house to learn